Task: Choose three colleague's posts in the above forum and award them points for their contribution to the discussion. Use the rubric Discussion Board Expectations, above to mark them. Assume that there are 2 marks for 'Exceeds Expectation', 1 mark for 'Meets Expectation' and 0 marks for 'Does Not Meet Expectation.' Maximum number of marks is 14.
Use this forum below to provide feedback and the marks you have allocated to each of your colleagues.
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 00
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 01
written quality = 01
timeliness = 02
Tone = 02
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 02
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 01
written quality = 02
timeliness = 01
Tone = 02
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 02
contribution to the community = 01
comprehension = 01
written quality = 01
timeliness = 01
Tone = 02
Lucy Wanja 12/14
Relevance =2
Use of example =1
Contribution to community learning=2
Comprehension =2
Written quality =2
Timeliness =2
Tone =1
Peter Mwangoma 11/14
Relevance =2
Use of example =2
Contribution to community learning=2
Comprehension =2
Written quality =1
Timeliness =1
Tone =1
Collins Odanga 11/14
Relevance =2
Use of example =1
Contribution to community learning=1
Comprehension =2
Written quality =2
Timeliness =2
Tone =1
Good work
Great work, well organised
Good observation seen.
Name: Barnabas Ikahu Marks = 11/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 2
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 1
Timeliness: 1
Tone: 1
Name: Stanley Mutisya Marks = 13/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 2
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 1
Name: Patrick Etyang Marks = 12/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 0
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 2
@Geoffrey, I have noticed no one seems to have gotten 14/14, looks an upheaval task! Hahahaha!
@Mwangoma a good number of us actually we miss one or two things ie giving example here, a typo there or a missing link. All these deny a mark. As teachers we even become keener when marking
@Mwangoma. Ya it is a task. On the other hand, we are still learning sir
Great Job!! Though this task is not easy
@Geoffrey you have done good work.
Etyang 12/14
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 00
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 02
written quality = 02
timeliness = 02
Tone = 02
Collins 10/14
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 00
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 01
written quality = 01
timeliness = 02
Tone = 02
Mutisya 11/14
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 00
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 02
written quality = 01
timeliness = 02
Tone = 02
Relevance = 02
use of examples = 00
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 02
written quality = 02
timeliness = 02
Tone = 02
Seems you put each alone
@Jason just a reminder we are awarding three people
Ikahu Marks = 11/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples = 1
Contribution to Learning Community= 2
Comprehension = 2
Written Quality = 1
Timeliness = 1
Tone = 2
I later realized it's not easy to formulate relevant examples. However it was an eye opener.
Relevance = 02
Use of examples = 02
Contribution to the community = 02
Comprehension = 02
Written quality = 01
Timeliness = 01
Tone = 01
Relevance =2
Use of example =2
Contribution to community learning=2
Comprehension =2
Written quality =2
Timeliness =2
Tone =1
Relevance =2
Use of examples =1
Contribution to community learning= 2
Comprehension =2
Written quality =2
Timeliness =2
Tone =1
Relevance =2
Use of examples =1
Contribution to community learning=1
Comprehension =2
Written quality =2
Timeliness =2
Tone =2
Good scores
Name: Jason Ichai
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 0
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 1
Total marks: 11/14
Name: Lucy Wanja
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 2
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 1
Tone: 2
Total marks: 13/14
Name: Peter Mwangoma
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 1
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 1
Tone: 1
Total marks: 10/14
Good in scoring
Analyzing a post to award the required marks is a real task as well. Keep up Collins
StanleyMutisya
Total=12/14
Ruth Mutua
Total=9/14
Anthony Nzioki
Total=10/14
Name: Kisach Mary
Relevance: 2
Use of examples:1
Contribution to learning community:2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 1
Tone: 1
Total Marks: 11/14
Name: Collins Odanga
Relevance: 2
Use of examples:1
Contribution to learning community:2
Comprehension:1
Written Quality:2
Timeliness:2
Tone: 2
Total Marks:12/14
Name: Lucy Wanja
Relevance: 2
Use of examples:1
Contribution to learning community:2
Comprehension:2
Written Quality:2
Timeliness: 1
Tone: 1
Total Marks:11/14
The above have really tried but on examples only some have really exhausted them. So I think on the exams work has to be done. On comprehension this is fairly done. Otherwise you have all tried.
@Ruth.....citing examples has really featured....a good advice for improvement.
Thanks.
Stanley Mutisya =11/14
Relevance = 2
Use of examples = 1
Contribution to the community = 2
Comprehension = 2
Written quality = 1
Timeliness = 1
Tone = 2
By the time of this feedback all the post by Stanley were done within the same day though there is room for others to comment on them. Examples need to be made more relevant while analysis of all point will point one or so ambiguity.
Lucy Wanja = 12/14
Relevance = 2
Use of examples = 1
Contribution to the community = 2
Comprehension = 2
Written quality = 2
Timeliness = 1
Tone = 2
Not enough examples used and there's only one post as of this feedback time. Depending on the number of total number of members who have made their contributions, there is still time for others to comment on Lucy's post.
Mary Kisach = 10
Relevance = 2
Use of examples = 0
Contribution to the community = 2
Comprehension = 2
Written quality = 2
Timeliness = 1
Tone = 1
No examples used. All posts done the same day. Flat tone
Good dvice
@Barbnabus you are right examples either used sparingly or not used at all.
Thanks good work.
@Ikahu, clear and precise analysis. Good work!
Name: Peter Mwangoma
relevance- 2
use of examples- 1
contribution to community-2
comprehension -2
written quality-2
timelines -2
tone-1
total: 12/14
kisach;
relevance- 2
use of examples- 2
contribution to community-1
comprehension-2
written quality-2
timelines- 2
tone-1
total. 12/14
Ruth mutua:
relevance-2
use of examples-1
contribution to community-1
comprehension --2
written quality--2
timelines--2
tone
total: 11/14
Joel Kahindi: 12
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 2
Contributing to learning community: 1
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 1
Peter Mwangoma:
Relevance: 2
@mohamme you seem not to have completed your submission here...if I am not wrong.
Mohammed Dhidha
Relevance-2
Use of examples-1
Contribution to learning-2
Comprehension-2
Written quality-1
Timeless-1
Tone-2
Total=11/14
Joel Kahindi
Relevance-2
Use of examples-1
Contribution to learning-2
Comprehension-2
Written quality-2
Timeless-1
Tone-2
Total=12/14
Barnabas Ikahu
Relevance-2
Use of examples-1
Contribution to learning-2
Comprehension-2
Written quality-2
Timeless-2
Tone-2
Total=13/14
@irene I see you have been comprehensive in awarding marks.
Barnabus scored high because there was a difference of days between his first posting and the others.
Use of examples in all of them was done sparingly thus scoring one mark each.
Mohammed scored less than the others in written quality coz i felt like he didnt expound more on his point ie what is famously known to teachers as'adding meat' to his points.
All the same they all showed that they understood what they were discussing.
Peter Mwangoma:12/14
Relevance=2
Use of examples=2
Contributing to learning community=1
Comprehension=2
Written Quality=2
Timeliness=1
Tone=1
Kisach Mary=13/14
Relevance=2
Use of examples=2
Contributing to learning community=2
Comprehension=2
Written Quality-2
Timeliness=1
Tone=2
Collins Odanga:
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 1
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 2
Total marks:13/14
Patrick Etyang:
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 1
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone:1
Total marks: 12/14
Barnabas Ikahu:
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 1
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 1
Timeliness: 2
Tone:1
Total marks: 11/14
This task has been the most challenging for me. Its quite a task analyzing work that is of such a high standard. Congratulations colleagues you are all quite good.
Name: Josephat Ong'ang'a Onyancha Marks = 10/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 0
Contribution to Learning Community: 1
Comprehension: 1
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 2
Name: Mohamed Dhidha Marks = 10/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 0
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 1
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 2
Tone: 1
Name: Joel Kahindi Marks = 11/14
Relevance: 2
Use of examples: 0
Contribution to Learning Community: 2
Comprehension: 2
Written Quality: 2
Timeliness: 1
Tone: 2
@grace I like your marks distribution, you have been a critical thinker.
Geoffrey Kimalel = 12/14
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 02
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 02
written quality = 01
timeliness = 02
Tone = 01
Jason Ichai = 9/14
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 00
contribution to the community = 01
comprehension = 02
written quality = 01
timeliness = 02
Tone = 01
Lucy Wanja = 11/14
Relevance= 02
use of examples= 01
contribution to the community = 02
comprehension = 02
written quality = 02
timeliness = 01
Tone = 01
Participants did a good job. However, there was minimal use of examples except in the case of Kimalel. It should also be noted that extensive quoting may not make for interesting reading. It is better to read and summarize what one has understood from the text as opposed to pasting the actual text read in a forum or chat.
@Martin, great work with pieces of advice there!
Martin great work. You have pointed out great insights of what is expected. That is relevancy.
Grace Mathu
Relevance -02
Examples-01
Contribution to learning community-00
Comprehension-02
Writing Quality-01
Timelines-01
Tone-02
Total =12/14
Emily Chepngeno
Relevance -02
Examples -00
Contribution to learning community -02
Comprehension -02
Writing Quality -02
Timelines -01
Tone -02
Total = 11/14
Rodgers Namwaya
Relevance -02
Examples -00
Contribution to learning community -01
Compression -02
Writing Quality -01
Timelines -01
Tone- 01
Total = 08/14
-Good work done. However Mr Namwaya's contribution needed more than the statement given. He may elaborate on his statement for members to get him clearly!
This is great with possible solution in areas of weakness
I agree with you Onyancha, I should have done more on this assignment. Point taken.
Josephat Onganga Onyanja
Relevance:02
Examples:01
Contribution to community:01
Comprehension:02
Writing quality:02
Timeline:02
Tone:02
TOTAL:12/14
Geofrey Kimalel
Relevance:02
Examples:02
Contribution to community:01
Comprehension:02
Written quality:02
Timeline02
Tone:02
TOTAL:13/14
Lucy Wanja
Relevance:02
Examples:01
Contribution to community:02
Comprehension:02
Written quality:02
Timeline:02
Tone:01
TOTAL:12/14
|
CRITERIA |
G. KIMALEL |
P. ETYANG’ |
R. MUTUA |
|
Relevance |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Use of examples |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Contribution to learning community |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Comprehension |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Written Quality |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
Timeliness |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
Tone |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
TOTAL MARKS |
11 |
09 |
08 |
@Leah I like your style of presentation.
good representation @leah
@Leah and Rodgers, I like the way you've done your work, keep it up.
| Name | Date | Relevance | Example use | Contribution | Comprehesion | Written quality | Timeliness | Tone | Total |
| Geofrey Kimalel | 22 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Barnabas Ikahu | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Lucy Wanja | 22 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
Stanley Mutisya
Relevance 02
Use of examples 02
Contribution to the community 02
Comprehension 02
Written quality 02
Timeliness 01
Tone 02
Total 13/14
Good Stanley, Keep it up!
Patrick Etyang
Relevance :2
Examples :0
Compression :2
Contribution to the community :2
Written quality :1
Timeliness : 2
Tone :2
Total 11/14
Antony Nzioki
Relevance :2
Examples :0
Compression :2
Contribution to the community :2
Written quality :1
Timeliness : 2
Tone :1
Total : 10/14
Grace Mathu
Relevance :2
Examples :0
Compression :1
Contribution to the community :2
Written quality :1
Timeliness : 2
Tone :2
Total : 9/14
1. Patrick Etyang
Total Score=12/14
2. Lucy Wanja
Total Score=13/14
3. Barnabas Ikahu
Total Score=12/14
| CRITERIA | Partrick Etyang | Geoffrey Kimalel | Barnabas Ikahu |
| Relevance | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Use of examples | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Contribution to the community | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Comprehension | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Written quality | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Timeliness | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Tone | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total Marks | 11 | 12 | 11 |
I found the engagement and contribution given by each participant very engaging as well as important to the discussion. The basis of rewarding of marks was through my engagement and the subsequent replies that each participant gave in support of their views. job well done Partrick!, Geofrrey! and Barnabas!
|
CRITERIA |
Lucy |
P.ETYANG’ |
Geofrey k. |
|
Relevance |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Use of examples |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Contribution to learning community |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Comprehension |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Written Quality |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Timeliness |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Tone |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
TOTAL MARKS |
13 |
12 |
12 |
you guys deserve above mark your contributions all round.